This article is in the news archives --- for current news go to the Third Branch News.
Courts' Compliance with E-Government Act Nearly Total
For 2006, the Judiciary reports to Congress that each of the nearly 200
federal courts have websites and the vast majority of those sites satisfy or
exceed all of the currently applicable requirements of the E-Government Act of
2002. By statute, a report on court compliance with the Act must be submitted to
Congress annually.
The E-Government Act, P.L. 107-347, is intended, in part, “to establish a
broad framework of measures that require using Internet-based information
technology to enhance citizen access to Government information and services.”
The Act requires each federal court to establish and maintain a website with
information or links to websites with information on court location and contact
information for the courthouse, local rules and standing or general orders of
the court, access to docket information for each case, access to the substance
of all written opinions issued by the court in a text-searchable format, and any
other information, including forms that the court determines useful to the
public. Federal courts comply with most of these requirements through the Public
Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system and the Case
Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system, which provide remote access to
electronic versions of documents filed with the courts.
A court unable to meet the Act’s requirements must submit an annual notice
with the reason for the deferral. In 2005, 21 courts filed notices of deferral
with the Administrative Office; in 2006, only seven courts asked to defer full
compliance with the Act. Courts’ reasons for deferring include not yet being
fully operational on the CM/ECF system, web-available opinions that are not text
searchable, and needing additional time to post general orders. All courts
expect to be compliant with current requirements by the end of 2006.
According to the 2006 report, the majority of courts are not only in
compliance, many are including more information on their websites than the Act
requires. Specifically, courts are using their websites to provide information
on the history of the court, information specific to potential jurors, and
information needed by members of their practicing bars. They are also using the
sites to allow the public greater access to more general information, including
job opportunities with the federal government, access to websites of other
branches and agencies of the federal government, and general information about
the federal government structure.