This article is in the news archives --- for current news go to the Third Branch News.
USSC to Hold Hearings on the Retroactivity of Cocaine Amendments
The U.S. Sentencing Commission
is seeking public comment on
whether or not recently proposed
amendments to the federal sentencing
guidelines should be made retroactive.
Retroactivity of the amendments will be
the topic of a June 1, 2011 hearing.
The new mandatory
minimum quantity threshold
levels for crack cocaine
offenses are consistent with
the Commission’s 2007 report
to Congress, Cocaine and
Federal Sentencing Policy.
In March, the Commission adopted
a permanent amendment implementing
the provisions of the Fair Sentencing Act
of 2010, legislation that, among other
things, reduced the statutory mandatory
minimum penalties for crack cocaine
trafficking and eliminated the mandatory
minimum sentence for simple possession
of crack cocaine. The Act also contained
directives to the Commission to review
and amend the federal sentencing guidelines
to account for certain aggravating
and mitigating circumstances in drug
trafficking cases to better account for
offender culpability. In October 2010, the
Commission promulgated an emergency,
temporary amendment to implement an
emergency directive in the Fair Sentencing
Act of 2010.
The Commission voted to set the
triggering quantities of crack cocaine
for the five and 10-year mandatory
minimum penalties (28 grams and 280
grams, respectively) at base offense
levels 26 and 32, which correspond to
a sentencing range of 63-78 months
and 121-151 months, respectively, for
a defendant with little or no criminal
history. The new mandatory minimum
quantity threshold levels for crack cocaine
offenses are consistent with the Commission’s
2007 report to Congress, Cocaine
and Federal Sentencing Policy, in which the
Commission, based on available information,
defined crack cocaine offenders
who deal in quantities of one ounce
(approximately 28 grams) or more in a
single transaction as wholesalers.
As a result of the Commission’s action, the federal sentencing
guidelines will focus more on offender culpability by placing
greater emphasis on factors other than drug quantity.
As a result of the Commission’s
amendments, the federal sentencing
guidelines will focus more on offender
culpability by placing greater emphasis on
factors other than drug quantity. Under
the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, the
Commission now must consider whether
this amendment to the federal sentencing
guidelines should apply retroactively.
In other actions the Commission
adopted amendments to:
- increase penalties for certain firearms
offenses. For example, the Commission
voted to provide increased penalties for
certain “straw purchasers” of firearms and
for offenders who illegally traffic firearms
across the United States border.
- implement the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Pub. L. No.
111–148), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act
of 2010 (Pub. L. No. 111–203), and the
Secure and Responsible Drug Disposal
Act of 2010 (Pub. L. No. 111–273). More
information regarding these amendments,
and other amendments, can be
found on the Commission’s website
at www.ussc.gov.
The Commission submitted its
2010-2011 amendment package to
Congress on April 28, 2011. Congress
has 180 days to review the amendments
submitted by the Commission. The
amendments have a designated effective
date of November 1, 2011, unless
Congress acts affirmatively to modify or
disapprove them.