| 00-CV | NAME
OF INDIVIDUAL AND/OR ORGANIZATION | DATE
REC'D | RULE
OR FORM | STATUS |
| 00-CV-A | J.
Michael Schaefer, Esq. | 01/24/00 | Civil
Rules | 10/05
– Advisory Committee considered and declined to take action |
| 00-CV-B | State
of California Department of Justice (Assistant Attorney General Dennis W. Dawson
for Hon. Bill Lockyear, Attorney General)
| 03/29/00 | Rule
23 | 04/00
– Advisory Committee referred to Class Action Subcommittee 10/00
– Advisory Committee considered and retained on agenda 04/01
– Advisory Committee considered when drafting revisions to Rule 23(e) but
declined to incorporate into the amendment; approved for submission to
Standing Committee 6/01 - Standing
Committee approved for publication for public comment 8/01
- Published for public comment 10/01
-Committee considered 1/02 - Committee considered 5/02
-Committee approved 6/02
-Standing Committee approved 6/02
- Devlin v. Scardelletti,
122 S.Ct. 2005 (6/10/02), resolved issue |
| 00-CV-C | Alcan
Aluminum Corporation (Lawrence A. Salibra, II, Esq.) | 06/05/00 | Rule
5 | 10/05
– Advisory Committee considered and declined to take action |
| 00-CV-D | Tom
Scherer | 06/26/00 | Manipulation
of Bar Codes in Mailing | 10/05
– Advisory Committee considered and declined to take action |
| 00-CV-E | Committee
on Federal Procedure of the Commercial and Federal Litigation Section of the
New York State Bar Association (Gregory K. Arenson, Esq.) | 08/07/00 | Rule
26 | 10/05
– Advisory Committee considered 5/06 - Advisory Committee considered 4/08
- Advisory Committee approved for submission to Standing Committee 06/08
– Standing Committee approved for publication for public comment 08/08
– Published for public comment 02/09
– Advisory Committee considered 04/09
– Advisory Committee approved for submission to Standing Committee 06/09
– Standing Committee approved for submission to Judicial Conference 09/09
– Judicial Conference approved for submission to Supreme Court 04/10
– Supreme Court promulgated |
| 00-CV-F | Hon.
Morton Denlow | 08/08/00 | Option
for Summary Bench Trials | 10/00
– Advisory Committee considered and declined to take action |
| 00-CV-G | Hon.
Barbara B. Crabb | 10/05/00 | Rule
5.1 (Appellate
Rule 44) | 01/02 – Advisory
Committee considered and retained on agenda 10/02 – Advisory
Committee considered and retained on agenda 05/03 – Advisory
Committee considered and approved for submission to the Standing Committee 06/03 – Standing
Committee approved for publication for public comment 08/03 - Published
for public comment 04/04 – Advisory Committee considered and
deferred action 01/05 - Standing
Committee approved for submission to the Judicial Conference 03/05 - Judicial Conference approved
for submission to the Supreme Court 04/06
– Supreme Court promulgated |
| 00-CV-H | Roy
H. Wepner, Esq. | 11/30/00 | Rule
6 | 05/02 – Advisory
Committee considered and retained on agenda 10/02 – Advisory
Committee considered and retained on agenda 05/03 – Advisory
Committee considered and approved for submission to Standing Committee 06/03 - Standing Committee approved for Publication for
public comment 08/03 - Published for public comment 04/04 – Advisory Committee considered and
approved for submission to Standing Committee 06/04 - Standing Committee approved for
submission to Judicial Conference 09/04 - Judicial Conference approved for
submission to Supreme Court 04/05 - Supreme Court promulgated |
| 00-CV-I | Professor
Stephen D. Easton | 12/04/00 | Rule
26 | See
also suggestion 00-CV-E 10/05
– Advisory Committee considered 5/06 - Advisory
Committee considered 4/08 - Advisory Committee approved for submission to Standing Committee 06/08
– Standing Committee approved for publication for public comment 08/08
– Published for public comment 02/09
– Advisory Committee considered 04/09
– Advisory Committee approved for submission to Standing Committee 06/09
– Standing Committee approved for submission to Judicial Conference 09/09
– Judicial Conference approved for submission to Supreme Court 04/10
– Supreme Court promulgated |