The Committee has also advised that it was permissible for a judge
to participate as a faculty member in a two-week seminar on humanistic
studies, for which no compensation was paid the judge, but the judge was
reimbursed for the travel expenses of the judge and the judge's spouse
and for their maintenance expenses during the period of the institute.
We understood that the program was nonprofit in character but that nonfaculty
who attended, primarily business and professional people, were charged
tuition and maintenance expenses while in attendance, and that the content
of the seminar was broadly based, philosophic in nature, and intended to
promote discussion in depth among faculty and participants. The Committee
agreed the judge could properly participate so long as the commitment did
not interfere with official duties and gave no ground for any reasonable
suspicion that the judge's office persuaded others to patronize or contribute
to the seminar sponsor.
January 21, 1970
Revised July 10, 1998
Note:
1. See also Advisory Opinion No. 67.