COMMITTEE ON CODES OF CONDUCT
ADVISORY OPINION NO. 9

Judge Testifying as a Character Witness.

A district judge in a multi-judge district has made inquiry relating to the circumstances under which a judge should testify as a character witness in a criminal trial in the judge's own district. The circumstances giving rise to the inquiry are as follows: A state court trial judge of the district in question is on trial on federal fraud charges. The defendant proposes to ask one or more of the federal judges of the district to testify as a character witness. These judges hold differing views as to the propriety of such a judge or judges appearing as a witness, especially in the judge's own district.

Canon 2 of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, and the Commentary thereto, provide valuable guidance. Canon 2 states, "[a] judge should not testify voluntarily as a character witness." The Commentary elaborates further on this advice:
The testimony of a judge as a character witness injects the prestige of the judicial office into the proceeding in which the judge testifies and may be misunderstood to be an official testimonial. This Canon, however, does not afford the judge a privilege against testifying in response to an official summons. Except in unusual circumstances where the demands of justice require, a judge should discourage a party from requiring the judge to testify as a character witness.
The Committee believes that the practice of judges appearing as character witnesses should be discouraged, but we agree that, if subpoenaed, a judge must respond to the subpoena. If a judge testifies, we believe that some of the otherwise unfortunate effects from the giving of such testimony would be dissipated if the trial judge made certain that, either on direct or cross-examination, it was made clear that the judge witness was testifying in response to a subpoena.

Moreover, to the extent that the trial court has discretion to limit character evidence generally the trial judge should consider limiting the number of judges appearing in such a role.

January 21, 1970
Revised January 16, 1998