Main content

Judicial Emergencies for April 2015

Judicial Emergencies As of 04/01/2015
Circuit/District Vacancy Created By Reason Vacancy Date Days Pending Weighted Filings per Judgeship* Adjusted Filings per Panel*
02 - NYE Garaufis,Nicholas G. Senior 10/01/2014 182 680
02 - NYE Feuerstein,Sandra J. Senior 01/21/2015 70 680
03 - NJ Martini,William J. Senior 02/10/2015 50 659
03 - NJ Pisano,Joel A. Retired 02/16/2015 44 659
03 - NJ Hochberg,Faith S. Retired 03/06/2015 26 659
03 - CCA Scirica,Anthony J. Senior 07/01/2013 639 551
04 - NCE Howard,Malcolm J. Senior 12/31/2005 3378 609
05 - TXE Schell,Richard A. Senior 03/10/2015 22 1226
05 - TXN Means,Terry Senior 07/03/2013 637 581
05 - TXS Hoyt,Kenneth M. Senior 03/02/2013 760 571
05 - TXS Jack,Janis Graham Senior 06/01/2011 1400 571
05 - TXS Tagle,Hilda G. Senior 12/31/2012 821 571
05 - TXW Junell,Robert A. Senior 02/13/2015 47 651
05 - CCA Garza,Emilio M. Senior 08/01/2012 973 939
05 - CCA King,Carolyn Dineen Senior 12/31/2013 456 939
06 - TNM Haynes Jr.,William Joseph Senior 12/01/2014 121 686
06 - CCA Martin Jr.,Boyce F. Retired 08/16/2013 593 546
07 - INS Barker,Sarah Evans Senior 06/30/2014 275 658
09 - CAC Collins,Audrey B. Retired 08/01/2014 243 663
09 - CAE Ishii,Anthony Wayne Senior 10/31/2012 882 1006
11 - ALM Thompson,Myron H. Senior 08/22/2013 587 511
11 - FLS Rosenbaum,Robin S. Elevated 05/12/2014 324 710
11 - CCA Dubina,Joel F. Senior 10/26/2013 522 885
Total Emergencies = 23
*Adjusted Filings per Panel and Weighted Filings per Judgeship are Calendar Year Data
A judicial emergency is defined as the following:
Circuit Court
  • any vacancy in a court of appeals where adjusted filings per panel are in excess of 700; OR
  • any vacancy in existence more than 18 months where adjusted filings are between 500 to 700 per panel.
  • District Court
  • any vacancy where weighted filings are in excess of 600 per judgeship; OR
  • any vacancy in existence more than 18 months where weighted filings are between 430 to 600 per judgeship; OR
  • any court with more than one authorized judgeship and only one active judge.
  • (1), In determining judgeship needs in the U.S. district courts, the Judicial Conference uses weighted filings
    as a means of accounting for differences in the time required for judges to resolve various types of civil and
    criminal actions. Rather than counting each case as a single case, weights are applied based on the nature of
    cases. For example, cases involving a defaulted student loan are counted as 0.031 for each case and patent cases
    are counted as 1.9 cases. The criminal weights are applied on a per-defendant basis. The total for
    "weighted filings per judgeship" is the sum of all weights assigned to civil cases and criminal defendants,
    divided by the number of authorized judgeships.
    (2), In the courts of appeals, adjusted filings are used in a similar manner to weighted filings in the district
    courts. Adjusted filings eliminate reinstated cases and weight pro se appeals as one-third of a case. All other
    cases have a weight of one. The total for "adjusted filings per panel" is adjusted filings divided by the number
    of authorized three-judge panels (authorized judgeships/3).
    April 2015
    Archived Judicial Vacancies for April 2015
    Archives by Year
    20172016201520142013
    20122011201020092008
    20072006200520042003
    20022001200019991998
    19971996199519941993
    19921991199019891988
    19871986198519841983
    19821981