Federal Judiciary
About U.S. CourtsNewsroomLibraryCourt LinksFrequently Asked QuestionsEmploymentContact Us
whiteline
1x1_amarelo
 Educational Outreach
1x1_amarelo
 
button Contemporary Topics
The First Amendment
 
button Constitution Day
 
button Courts to Classes Programs
 
button The Basics
 
button Return to Educational Outreach

Can Newspapers Be Prevented from Printing
"Malicious, Scandalous, or Defamatory" Material?

Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931)
Suggested talking points are not all Inclusive. Time limits are suggested guidelines and are not meant to be rigidly enforced.

Facts and Case Summary Background
Talking Points Similar Cases

Background

The First Amendment protects the freedom of the press. Before the American Revolution, English authorities often censored the press in order to ensure that articles critical of the government were not widely circulated. The Founders knew that a free press was essential for the promotion of ideas.

The Supreme Court of the United States has been highly critical of any attempt to impose a prior restraint on the press, i.e., prohibiting a paper from publishing a story. The Court has even made it harder for individuals to sue newspapers for libel and slander.

Today, suits involving freedom of the press are still prevalent in the courts. Some prominent issues are: 1) What constitutes "the press" in an age when many people can create their own blog on the Internet? 2) Must reporters reveal their sources when required to by legal authorities?

 

whiteline