Newsletter
of the
Federal
Courts
Vol. 35
Number 3
March 2003

 

Inside this Issue

Caseload in Federal Courts Still Rising
The FY 2003 Budget And the Federal Judiciary
Judiciary Asks Congress for New Bankruptcy Judgeships
200-Year-Old Judicial Decision Still Echoes Worldwide
Judicial Milestones
Judicial Boxscore
Judge Barbara Rothstein Selected To Head Federal Judicial Center
Two New Committee Chairs to Serve
Interview with Chief Judge Carolyn Dineen King
System of Choice May Improve Perception of Jury Duty

Click here to go to the
Federal Judiciary homepage.


 

Caseload in Federal Courts Still Rising

In fiscal year 2002, the federal courts experienced an across-the-board increase in the number of appellate, civil, criminal and bankruptcy filings, with most categories registering record highs. The number of cases filed in the U.S. courts of appeals in 2002 rose 0.2 percent, while total civil and criminal filings in the U.S. district courts rose 9 percent. Fiscal year 2002 is the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2001 and ending September 31, 2002.

To view these and other statistics in the 2002 Judicial Business of the U.S. Courts, visit the Judiciary’s web site at www.uscourts.gov, under Library.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Fiscal year filings in the U.S. courts of appeals rose 0.2 percent to 57,555 in fiscal year 2002. This is the seventh consecutive year of record-breaking levels.

A 75 percent increase in administrative agency appeals and a 3 percent increase in criminal appeals were enough to offset a 34 percent decline in original proceedings, a 12 percent drop in bankruptcy appeals, and a 2 percent decline in civil appeals. Immigration administrative agency appeals climbed 153 percent over 2001, with eight courts reporting growth greater than 100 percent. The increase was in part the result of Attorney General John Ashcroft’s February 2002 order to the Board of Immigration Appeals to clear its backlog of cases.

Filings of criminal appeals grew for the third consecutive year, totaling 11,569. The largest increases were in firearms cases (up 9 percent) and in drug-related appeals (4 percent.) Civil appeals filings fell to 35,499 in 2002 from 36,046 in 2001. This was due to a less than 1 percent drop in prisoner petitions, and a 3 percent decline in other civil appeals. These drops offset a 2 percent rise in civil rights appeals.

U.S. District Courts

Total fiscal year filings in the U.S. district courts rose 9 percent to 341,841 in 2002. Civil filings climbed 10 percent to 274,841. Largely due to marked increases in personal injury/product liability cases involving asbestos, filings related to personal injuries skyrocketed 98 percent. Total private civil filings increased 18 percent, reflecting substantial growth in federal question filings and diversity of citizenship filings. The overall growth caused civil filings per authorized judgeship to increase from 377 to 413.

Criminal case filings rose 7 percent to 67,000 in 2002. About a third of the increase was due to an administrative change for counting sealed cases in which the identity of a defendant is reported only when the case is unsealed. Starting in July 2002, sealed cases were counted when filed, instead of when unsealed. The change created a one-time jump in these cases. Criminal cases filed per authorized judgeship climbed from 94 in 2001 to 101 in 2002. The overall growth in criminal cases was mainly attributable to increases in firearms (up 26 percent), immigration (up 12 percent), fraud (up 8 percent), and drug (up 4 percent) filings. Other offenses, which constituted a smaller proportion of district courts’ caseload but increased significantly, included a 17 percent rise in sex offense filings, a 27 percent rise in extortion, racketeering and threats filings, and a 20 percent rise in filings under other federal statutes.

Dial 9-11 Affect the Federal Caseload?

The September 2002 Judicial Business covers the first full year of caseload statistics after September 11, 2001. Although caseload increased overall during that time, the specific impact of 9-11 on caseload is difficult to identify.

For example, in the U.S. courts of appeals, immigration administrative agency appeals climbed 153 percent because, in February 2002, Attorney General Ashcroft ordered the Board of Immigration Appeals to clear its backlog of cases. Ashcroft had said this step was needed to help prevent terrorist attacks and enforce the nation’s immigration laws. While the increased appellate caseload is not the direct result of cases filed following 9-11, it could be viewed as the result of increased awareness of homeland security.

In the U.S. district courts, there were increases in firearms, immigration and drug filings. The Attorney General asked the U.S. Attorneys Office in each district to coordinate an anti-terrorism task force. While their work has coincided with increases in certain types of criminal filings, these types of offenses had been the focus of prosecutions over the last several years. The difference since 9-11 is that prosecution of these offenses is now the responsibility of the agencies involved in the anti-terrorism task forces.

The clearest connection to 9-11 may be cases filed as a result of heightened airport security. There was a 20 percent rise in filings under federal statutes, which included violations of aircraft regulations and explosives. Prosecutions for aircraft regulation violations rose as security measures at airports and by airlines tightened following the September 11 attacks.

 

The number of defendants in criminal cases rose 6 percent to 88,354. Proceedings were concluded against 78,835 defendants, an increase of 4 percent. Of these, 70,882 were convicted, a conviction rate of 90 percent, the same as in 2001. The number of defendants imprisoned rose 5 percent to 56,686. Eighty-six percent of defendants disposed of pled guilty.

Weighted Filings per Authorized Judgeship

Weighted filings statistics account for the different amounts of time judges require to resolve various types of civil and criminal actions. In FY 2002, the total number of weighted filings per authorized judgeship rose 9 percent. Compared to FY 2001, the total number of weighted criminal felony defendants per judgeship increased 7 percent. The total number of weighted civil filings per authorized judgeship was up 8 percent from 2001.

U.S. Bankruptcy Courts

Bankruptcy filings for fiscal year 2002 reached a record level, increasing 8 percent over fiscal year 2001. Total filings of both business and nonbusiness bankruptcies increased, with overall growth due to an 8 percent rise in nonbusiness petitions. In FY 2002, nonbusiness filings rose under all chapters, climbing 32 percent under chapter 11, 10 percent under chapter 13 and 7 percent under chapter 7. Business filings rose 2 percent, with a 9 percent growth in chapter 11, but a 15 percent drop in chapter 12, and 1 percent drops in chapters 7 and 13. Although a pending bankruptcy bill in Congress may have encouraged some debtors to file bankruptcy petitions, the overriding impetus for the increase most likely was high consumer debt combined with slow economic growth.

Probation

On September 30, 2002, the total number of persons under supervision was 108,792, a 4 percent increase over the total number reported as of September 30, 2001. Persons serving terms of supervised release following their release from prison climbed 7 percent to 73,189, and constituted 67 percent of all persons under supervision. Parole cases declined 9 percent, and those involving mandatory release dropped 21 percent. Nationally, 43 percent of persons under supervision committed drug offenses and 3 percent immigration offenses. Fifty-nine percent of offenders with conditions indicating substance abuse received federally funded substance abuse treatment.

Pretrial Services

The number of defendants in cases opened in the pretrial services system grew 4 percent in 2002 to 89,421. Higher numbers of defendants charged with immigration offenses and firearms offenses were the primary source of the increase. Pretrial services officers prepared 85,994 pretrial services reports in 2002. These reports help ensure that judicial officers have sufficient information when deciding whether to release or detain defendants and when determining the least restrictive release conditions that offer reasonable assurance that defendants will honor future court commitments and not endanger the community. Detention hearings were held for 53 percent of defendants whose cases were activated. Detention was ordered for 75 percent of defendants who had detention hearings. Pretrial services officers interviewed 63,528 defendants in 2002, at which time they identified alternatives to detention. As a result, 32,808 defendants were placed on supervised release. Of the defendants released following hearings, 92 percent were released with restrictive conditions: substance abuse testing and treatment were ordered for 19,333 of these released defendants, house arrest and electronic monitoring for 6,655 of the defendants, and mental health treatment for 2,288 defendants.

Outside Earned Income Ceiling Increases
With the January 1, 2003, increase in the basic pay for Executive Schedule employees, the ceiling on outside earned income for federal judges also increases, from $22,550 in 2002 to $23,205 in 2003. The ceiling applies only to outside earnings and not to investment income, royalties, pensions, and similar income sources that are specifically excluded by regulation.

The Ethics Reform Act prohibits high-ranking government officials from having outside earned income exceeding "15 percent of the annual rate of basic pay for Level II of the Executive Schedule." Effective January 1, 2003, the basic pay for Level II increased to $154,700.

 
 
Next